Saturday, May 30, 2020

Poem and Figurative Language Summary - 825 Words

Poem and Figurative Language Summary (Research Paper Sample) Content: Poem and Figurative Language Summary Name: Institution: Robert Frost’s work (The Road Not Taken) has been principally viewed as a symbol of life journey. As a matter of fact, this is the first message or meaning that is gotten by a reader. Nonetheless, the poem uses as number of metaphors, imagery, rhyme as well as structure. All these are used to give the work a hidden meaning or message. Basically, a metaphor relates to any implied comparison between things that are unlike. In this figure of speech or writing, terms and or phrases are applied to things which they are not literally applicable so as to suggest a resemblance. Frost’s work most noticeable metaphor is that of the road. This metaphor is utilized throughout the poem, of which makes it an extended metaphor. In the beginning of this poem, Frost shows that the road –and choices he makes- has an impact on his life. For instance, his work talks about â€Å"two roads diverg e†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Basically, he has to choose between these diverging roads in order to reach a given destination. As a matter of fact, this is evidenced towards the end of Frost’s work when he talks about â€Å"made all the difference† (Faggen, 1997). Altogether, the road was chosen and it was a turning point in his life. Imagery relates to the representation of sense experience via language. In this poem, imagery is used to illustrate the manner in which his decision was important. Imagery is additionally used to illustrate the impact made by his decision. For instance, about the diverged roads, Frost’s work questions whether this or that is the right way. Incidentally, the poet knows that he â€Å"could not travel both†. Also, the road is in the wood is yellow, and this insinuates autumn. During this time, leaves change color as their life starts to die. Nevertheless, the aforementioned passage makes a reader see the decision about to be made as a diffi cult one. Through the middle, the poem also talks about â€Å"green and wanted wear†. Of course, the use of the term green signifies that there is life. However, the inclusion of yellow and green brings out a difference. Thus, imagery is used to illustrate the impact made by decisions on someone’s life. Rhyme relates to repetition of sounds that are similar. In most cases, this happens in two or more terms/words. For instance, the poem employs rhyming words (words, wood, stood, and could) in the first stanza. This aids the reader of the poem to enjoy reading it, and make the poem pleasurable. The structure of this poem is highlighted through its four stanzas. They show the manner in which the poet’s choice impacts his life. The fist stanza is all about an explanation of the situation of choosing a road to take. The second one is about the speaker choosing a road that is less used. However, we see him describing the road of his choice, but he would have liked to travel both. The last stanza is an explanation of the difference brought about by his choice. Conclusively, the figurative language in this poem takes a reader through the poet’s mind and journey. As such, they make is captivating. Metaphor is evident in Browning’s work (My Last Duchess) especially because this poem develops women/females as objects. For instance, the duchess is seen in painting â€Å"†¦painted in the wall†, though the poet makes it clear that the duchess was already an object before her death. As a matter of fact, the late duchess’s husband makes it clear that life was full of restrictions. We later learn that the duchess’s death was caused by the husband â€Å"I gave commands†. The husband had to get it his way in order to feel that he eliminated the problem. This figurative language ty...

Saturday, May 16, 2020

Christianity vs. Entrapment in OConnor Wise Blood Essay

Christianity vs. Entrapment in OConnors Wise Blood In The Cage of Matter: The World as Zoo in Flannery OConnors Wise Blood, William Rodney Allen addresses the reverse evolution of Enoch Emery and the inverted quest for salvation of Hazel Motes, suggesting a parallel between the two main characters of OConnors novel which reinforces its theme of the utter hopelessness of those who reject or mock Christ. Allen shows that OConnor describes the spiritually devoid characters in her book in animal-like terms, equating faithless humans with soulless animals. The essay further asserts that OConnor uses the zoo as a metaphor for a physical world that entraps those without spirituality. Indeed, the novel shows a world of†¦show more content†¦Enochs pathetic christening of the museum mummy as the new jesus garners him only disappointment. Likewise, his transformation into a gorilla fails to deliver him from his entrapment; as Allen says, The human animal has come to the limit of his freedom, and he symbolically finds himself alone in h is cage (268). Throughout most of the novel, Hazel remains similarly trapped. Allen points out several symbolic traps that Hazel encounters, from his berth in the train to, paradoxically, his car, which Hazel erroneously regards as the way to freedom (262-63). As Allen points out, neither the new jesus, Asa Hawks, his own blasphemous Church of Christ without Christ, nor his car can help him escape from the prison of himself (267). OConnors position is that a way exists for man to escape the prison of the mundane physical world, but it is not of self-will and has nothing to do with material possessions. This position is in contrast to those of many OConnor contemporaries; Jack Kerouac, for instance, made a career of celebrating the joys of the physical world, most notably in his novel On the Road, which portrays the automobile as a quick ticket to freedom. Other American novelists, such as F. Scott Fitzgerald in The Great Gatsby and Ernest Hemingway in The Sun Also Rises, decried the spiritual wasteland they saw the world as but offered little hope for escape from it.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Compare And Contrast Marx And Weber - 1877 Words

Marx and Weber both provide a critical analysis of capitalism, studying the origins of capitalism and the general characteristic of today’s capitalistic society. This essay will be discussing the similarities and differences between both sociologist’s in their writings of capitalism. To begin with, Marx’s work and contributions will be considered, particularly focusing on his main book, Capital, and how this book is a very clear demonstration of the emergence of capitalism in the nineteenth century. His concept of alienation will be looked at, as will his idea of commodity fetishism and how he placed paramount importance on the idea of exchange value in developing a capitalist society. This essay will then be moving on to a comparison†¦show more content†¦Marx made the assertion that this transition occurred with the increasing conflict between the economy of the city and the rural economy, which ultimately led to a division between production and commer ce. Between 1475 and 1850, an economic change took place in property relations, which resulted in feudal land being transformed into private property. As the seizure of property became increasingly common, serf labourers were unable to meet even the most basic of economic needs. Due to this, the labourers were placed at the hands of those who owned the new forces of production, which caused them to become the ‘detached classless’ who began searching for way to earn their livelihoods by selling their labour in the new industrial centres that were quickly emerging. Upon recognising these historical conditions, Marx went on to define Capitalism as a system of social relations which became set in motion during historical periods during the transformation from feudal to industrial economies. Marx took the argument that neither labour, money nor commodities were enough to solely define capitalism. Upon making this statement, Marx held the view that for a society to be capitalistic, both money and basic commodities needed to be conveyed into a social relation system. Corresponding to Morrison (2010, p. 84) Marx argued that a commodity was ‘a thing whose qualities can satisfy human needs’. Such examples of these commodities that Marx identified were bread, clothes andShow MoreRelatedCompare and Contrast the Marxist and Weberian Theories of Social Class. Why Do You Think Marx Emphasises Relations of Production in the Formation of Classes Whilst Weber Suggests the Market and Consumption Are the Important Factors?1750 Words   |  7 PagesCompare and contrast the Marxist and Weberian theories of social class. Why do you think Marx emphasises relations of production in the formation of classes whilst Weber suggests the market and consumption are the important factors? All human societies have been class based in some way, shape or form and, interpreting this in the most basic way, it can be said that in every known human society there has been a fundamental division between two broad social groups, the buorgeoisie that own and controlRead MoreCompare and Contrast Marxist and Weberian Theories of Stratification1525 Words   |  7 PagesQ: Compare and Contrast Marxist and Weberian Theories of Stratification. The purpose of this essay is to compare, contrast and critically evaluate Marxist and Weberian theories of stratification. To do this effectively this essay must explain and consider the main features, claims and perspectives of both Karl Marx and Max Weber. O’Donnell (1992) defines social stratification as â€Å"the division of a society or group into hierarchically ordered layers. Members of each layer are considered broadly equalRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1324 Words   |  6 PagesKarl Marx and Max Weber were influential sociologists that paved the way for modern sociological school of thought. Both, Karl Marx and Max Weber contributed a lot to the study and foundation of sociology. Without their contributions sociology would not be as prominent as it is today. From the contribution of how sociology should be studied, to how they applied their theories to everyday life has influenced many sociologists. Predominantly, both of these theorists’ discussed the effe cts of capitalismRead MoreMarx, Weber, Durkheim And Durkheim883 Words   |  4 Pagesof sociology are Marx, Weber, and Durkheim and they are referred to as the sociological canon. Social order, stability, and the classification of the human society was of great impetus to the theories of the sociological canon. The purpose of this essay is to describe the classification of human society, according to Marx, Weber and Durkheim; as well as, critically compare and contrast the sociological canon’s different explanations of social order and stability. To begin , Marx classified humanRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1003 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction Karl Marx and Max Weber both made tremendous contribution on the development of Sociology. Their studies and theories still have significant meaning for modern sociologists to explore the social world. As Weber are born after Marx about several decades, his theories are influenced by Marx to a great extend so that Weber finds much common ground with Marx. Their conceptions about religion,capitalism, social class and power are in some ways compatible. The aspects of their study areRead MoreKarl Marx, Emile Durkheim And Max Webers Influence On Religion1727 Words   |  7 PagesThree theorists, Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, are undoubtedly the fathers of modern sociology. â€Å"Nineteenth century Western Europe was pounded by pivotal forces of transformation. Politics, education, religion, communication science, art, and social life were being revolutionized.† (Mohseni 1994;85) Each with distinct views on society and religion, these sociologists are and their the ories are significant especially in the field of society. Just as much as they play a major role in theRead MoreCritique Of Hegel s Pure Thoughts1408 Words   |  6 Pagesfreedom. Offering an opposing analysis to Hegel’s pure thoughts, Marx a materialist, saw ideas and perceptions as the result of material social, economical and historical conditions. Marx analyzed the basis of all history to understand civil society. Property was at the basis of Marx’s argument and how the state developed. In critiquing Hegel, Marx thought reality created the mind. People’s ideas and ideologies were conditioned by the historical formation of powers or production and relations toRead MoreKarl Marx And Max Weber1332 Words   |  6 Pagesstudy of religion. I chose Karl Marx and Max Weber for my paper assignment. Two sociologists and philosophers have discussed their views on religion and its impact on society. Most of the Sociologist of that time wrote about the role of religion in society, Karl Marx and Max Weber observations are particularly relevant for our course. Religion is one of the principle social ideologies that impacts social stability and modification. This paper will compare and contrast their views on the impact of religionRead MoreIncome Inequality : The Perspectives Of Marx And Weber Essay1505 Words   |  7 PagesPerspectives of Marx and Weber In the United States, income inequality is drawing more and more attention from the media, sociologists, politicians, and everyday citizens like us since the economic difference during the past decades became more pronounced than before. Karl Marx and Max Weber both discussed their ideas of social inequality and addressed the relationship between inequality and social structure as an important theme in their work. This paper compares and contrasts the approaches of Marx and WeberRead MoreMarx Weber and Durkheim on Religion Essays1378 Words   |  6 PagesAll three main sociologist writers Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religio n put forward by Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marxs and Durkheims

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Should There Be A Nuclear Power Plant In Saskatche Essay Example For Students

Should There Be A Nuclear Power Plant In Saskatche Essay wan?I think there should be a nuclear power plant built in Saskatchewanbecause I believe it would contribute to the province a great deal. There is agrowing need for power in Saskatchewan. Right now in Saskatchewan there is a need for more power. There hasquestion as to putting a nuclear plant is Saskatchewan This I think is the idealchoice of power plants because on 1 bundle of uranium is equal to the poweroutput of 400 tones or 1900 barrels of oil. This is more than adequate to copewith our need for power. Also one good example of our need is that during winterSaskatchewan has to buy power from other provinces in order to have, that is howserious the shortage is. In Saskatchewan there is lots of unemployment. Building a nuclear powerplant would create more jobs. This would also benefit the government becauseless people would be collecting unemployment insurance and welfare. Thus addingto the amount the government could be spending on other things such as fixinghighways, better healthcare, and more funding to school. Nuclear power is also a lot environment wise. Nuclear power requires amere fraction of the space that is required to set up a solar, wind, orhydroelectric generating station which. This will allow more space for privatelandowners and will also keep land prices at a lower cost. Nuclear power is alsoa much cleaner operating type of fuel. The amount of waste produced is from anuclear power plant is not even a fraction of the amount of sulfur, carbonmonoxide, and nitrogen oxide produced by a coal plant. By building a nuclearpower we will reduce acid rain and not add to the global warming. Hydro stationsform algae in lakes which reduces the amount of oxygen in the water making itharder for marine life to survive. Although the damage nuclear accidents causeis very bad the risk of a accident is not very probable, so in the long run thedamages caused by a nuclear power are very little compared to other generatingstations. Also lets look at economy. Any new industry or company brought to theprovince also bring income to the government. Which will again make thegovernment able to improve other also important Things. Nuclear power is also a cheaper fuel. Since we have such large depositsof uranium in Saskatchewan it will cost barely anything to fuel the reactorsSo you see it only makes sense to place a nuclear reactor inSaskatchewan because of the lesser amount of pollution and cost to run a nuclearreactor. Category: Social Issues